New HTM paper – “Why Neurons Have Thousands of Synapses, A Theory of Sequence Memory in Neocortex”
|The artificial neuron model used by Jeff Hawkins and Subutai Ahmad in their new paper (image reproduced from their paper, and cropped). Their neuron model is inspired by the pyramidal cells found in neocortex layers 2/3 and 5.|
It has been several years since Jeff Hawkins and Numenta published the Cortical Learning Algorithm (CLA) whitepaper.
Now, Hawkins and Subutai Ahmad have pre-published a new paper (currently to arXiv, but peer-review will follow):
The paper is interesting for a number of reasons, most notably the combination of computational and biological detail. This paper expands on the artificial neuron model used in CLA/HTM. A traditional integrate-and-fire artificial neuron has one set of inputs and a transfer function. This doesn’t accurately represent the structure or function of cortical neurons, that come in various shapes & sizes. The function of cortical neurons is affected by their structure and quite unlike the the traditional artificial neuron.
Hawkins and Ahmad propose a model that best fits Pyramidal cells in neocortex layers 2/3 and 5. They explain the morphology of these neurons by assigning specific roles to the various dendrite types observed.
They propose that each dendrite is individually a pattern-matching system similar to a traditional artificial neuron: The dendrite has a set of inputs to which it responds, and a transfer function that decides whether enough inputs are observed to “fire” the output (although nonlinear continuous transfer functions are more widely used than binary output).
In the paper, they suggest that a single pyramidal cell has dendrites for recognising feed-forward input (i.e. external data) and other dendrites for feedback input from other cells. The feedback provides contextual input that allows the neuron to “fire” only in specific sequential contexts (i.e. given a particular history of external input).
To produce an output along its axon, the complete neuron needs both an active feed-forward dendrite and an active contextual dendrite; when the neuron fires, it implies that a particular pattern has been observed in a specific historical context.
In the original CLA whitepaper, multiple sequential contexts were embodied by a “column” of cells that shared a proximal dendrite, although they acknowledged that this differed from their understanding of the biology.
Hawkins and Ahmad’s paper does match the morphology and function of pyramidal cells more accurately than traditional artificial neural networks. Their conceptualisation of a neuron is far more powerful. However, this doesn’t mean that it’s better to model it this way in silico. What we really need to understand is the computational benefit of modelling these extra details. The new paper claims that their method has the following advantages over traditional ANNs:
– continuous learning
– robustness of distributed representation
– ability to deal with multiple simultaneous predictions
We follow Numenta’s work because we believe they have a number of good insights into the AGI problem. It’s great to see this new theoretical work and to have a solid foundation for future publications.